Requests
Add Request Feedback
Provide feedback on completed requests to improve reviewer performance and system quality over time
POST
Add feedback to completed requests to help improve reviewer performance and overall system quality. Feedback can include ratings, comments, and specific quality metrics that help reviewers understand what worked well and what could be improved.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.hitl.sh/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Authentication
Your API key for authentication
Path Parameters
The unique identifier of the completed request
Body Parameters
Feedback object containing ratings, comments, and quality metrics
Feedback Object Structure
The feedback object can contain any combination of the following fields:Overall quality rating (1-5 scale, where 5 is excellent)
Free-form text feedback and comments (max 1000 characters)
Response accuracy rating (1-5 scale)
Response timeliness rating (1-5 scale)
Response helpfulness rating (1-5 scale)
Whether you would recommend this reviewer for similar requests
Array of feedback tags (e.g., [“thorough”, “quick”, “insightful”])
Whether this request requires follow-up action
Feedback category: “positive”, “constructive”, “issue”
Response
Whether an error occurred
Success message
Feedback Categories
Use thecategory field to classify your feedback:
Positive
Use
positive for high ratings (4-5) and appreciation. Reinforces desired behaviors and builds reviewer confidence.Constructive
Use
constructive for moderate ratings (2-4) with specific improvement suggestions. Educational and growth-oriented feedback.Issue
Use
issue for low ratings (1-2) that identify problems. May require follow-up. Use sparingly for serious issues.Feedback Best Practices
Effective Feedback Structure
Be Specific
Be Specific
Good: “The analysis was thorough and covered all the key policy violations I mentioned in the request.”Avoid: “Good job.”Why: Specific feedback helps reviewers understand exactly what they did well.
Balance Appreciation and Improvement
Balance Appreciation and Improvement
Good: “Great attention to detail in identifying spam patterns. For future requests, could you also mention the confidence level of your assessment?”Avoid: “Everything was perfect” or “Everything was wrong.”Why: Balanced feedback encourages growth while recognizing strengths.
Focus on Behavior, Not Person
Focus on Behavior, Not Person
Good: “The response could benefit from more detailed examples to support the conclusion.”Avoid: “You’re not very thorough.”Why: Focus on actions and outcomes rather than personal characteristics.
Include Context
Include Context
Good: “Given the urgent nature of this content moderation request, the 15-minute response time was exactly what we needed.”Avoid: “Too slow.”Why: Context helps reviewers understand the specific requirements of different request types.
Feedback Analytics
Track Feedback Patterns
Monitor your feedback trends to improve request quality:Bulk Feedback Operations
Provide feedback on multiple completed requests:Feedback Templates
Pre-built Feedback Templates
Create reusable feedback templates for common scenarios:Excellent Performance Template
Excellent Performance Template
Good with Minor Improvements Template
Good with Minor Improvements Template
Needs Improvement Template
Needs Improvement Template
Quick Appreciation Template
Quick Appreciation Template
Access Control
Feedback Permissions
Request Creators Only
Request Creators Only
Only the API key that created the request can provide feedback on it.
Completed Requests Only
Completed Requests Only
Feedback can only be added to requests with status “completed”.
One Feedback Per Request
One Feedback Per Request
Currently, each request can receive one feedback entry. Future versions may support multiple feedback entries or feedback updates.
Error Handling
Common Error Scenarios
Request Not Completed
Request Not Completed
Invalid Rating Values
Invalid Rating Values
Comment Too Long
Comment Too Long
Request Not Found
Request Not Found
Impact of Feedback
On Reviewers
Performance Insights
Performance Insights
Feedback helps reviewers understand what works well and what needs improvement in their review process.
Motivation and Recognition
Motivation and Recognition
Positive feedback boosts reviewer motivation and recognizes good work.
Skill Development
Skill Development
Constructive feedback provides specific areas for improvement and learning opportunities.
Quality Standards
Quality Standards
Consistent feedback helps establish and maintain quality standards across the reviewer team.
On System Quality
Improved Matching
Improved Matching
Feedback data can be used to better match requests with appropriate reviewers based on past performance.
Quality Metrics
Quality Metrics
Aggregate feedback provides insights into overall system performance and areas for improvement.
Process Optimization
Process Optimization
Feedback patterns help identify bottlenecks and optimization opportunities in the review process.
Next Steps
View Request History
Review your request history and identify requests that could benefit from feedback.
Reviewer Guidelines
Learn how reviewers see and respond to feedback on the mobile app.